Decision Making Case Study Introduction This case discusses Office Raymond Ripley who used force and carried out police pursuit against the new policy that has been introduced by the department that has prohibited pursuits in cases where there is no sign of violent felony crime and the public being put in danger or a situation that would Justify the potential liability and danger.
Central Issues The first central issue that could be found in this story is that Deputy Raymond “Racine’ Ray’ Ripley “engages in vehicle and foot pursuits and every opportunity’ (Peak, 010), goes home and gets his German Sheppard when conducting late-night building checks, and has a teaser stun device in his trunk which he is not allowed to have because he is not trained or certified (Peak, 2010).
When it comes to the actual case study, a central issue that Deputy Ripley has is that he is automatically thinking that nobody should be in his patrol sector after pm (Peak, 2010), and so any car he is going to automatically be thinking is doing something bad. When the car takes off at a high rate of speed towards Deputy Riley, he opens his door and lets his dog out at he car, fires his teaser at the car when the car is passing (Peak, 2010), which again he is not authorized to have. Use of Force Policy It is believed that Deputy Ripley was not in compliance with the use of force policy.
This is believed because letting the dog out of the car is not going to do anything but put the dog in danger because off speeding car. The warning shot that Deputy Ripley fired was also unnecessary because he could have shot and injured the suspect that was in the speeding car causing the car to lose control and who knows what would have have happened. What Deputy Riley should have done when he noticed the suspect get into his vehicle was to get into his vehicle and get prepared to begin pursuit while waiting for answers from dispatch as what to do.
End the Pursuit It is believed that the lieutenant should not end the pursuit. This is believed because the pursuit did not begin until the suspect in the car did not commit a felony until he had attempted to hit the officer with his car. Even though at last minute the suspect in the car veered and missed and took off, does not mean that the attempt on Deputy Riley life was not committed. Warning Shots Like stated earlier, it is not believed that Deputy Riley should have fired warning shots. This is believed because shooting a warning shot at a speeding vehicle could potentially cause more harm than good.
Also, the new policy that was put into place says that a warning shot could not be fired unless the situation called for it (Peak, 2010). This situation did not. Complaints It is not believed that there are any policies in which would cover the actions of what Deputy Riley did. Deputy Riley was out of order for doing extra patrol in the first lace without authorization from a superior. Add in the teaser, the dog, and the warning shot when not necessary, and it is thought that Deputy Ripley was out of order from the beginning.
It is believed that Internal Affairs would find him in fault believed because he was not supposed to be there in the first place, and then he did every step wrong even with having the new training on the policies and procedures. Additional Policies There should not be any more policies unstated. This is believed because when the previous incident had occurred and the policies were changed for those actions that ere taken, it was made very clear what the policies were and also that adequate training was conducted.
This was a blatant disregard for policy and Deputy Riley should be the one punished from those actions. In conclusion, from the beginning Deputy Riley was wrong. He was on extra patrol without approval, he had his German Sheppard with him, and had a teaser. Deputy Riley let his dog loose, shot a warning shot, and then proceeded to shoot a teaser at a car that was not committing a felony in the first place nor was showing presence of being a danger to society.